ACCREDITORS STILL ON FRONT PAGE


 

bigstock-education-reform-school-refo-48690005-750x460

 

It has been an interesting past six years for colleges to focus on their role for serving students. There has been an ongoing audit and search into services colleges provide. The pathway to questioning the outcomes of colleges and schools took a turn towards the accreditation agencies and their efficiencies. As some of this investigation seemed to quiet down there is now a new report regarding four accrediting agencies mission and actions. The U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General released a new report. As you will see in the report there exist criticism but no outline with accreditors to achieve a positive forward-looking solution. For six years school have been looking to government oversight to provide synergism with what will be the solution for serving students.

Our schools have been the rock of our society and civilization as our forefathers had intended. The damage to our schools continues to have a long-term effect on our communities, values, and economy. Most of the issues have culminated into the inequity of requirements between schools and colleges. Equity varies by accreditation organizations. Higher regulations exist for some schools by what  accreditor they have been encouraged to join. Other accreditation organizations are exclusive and are being pardoned from other requirements spelled out for others. Equity, fairness and oversight is lacking in the foundation of what an accreditor should be on how to provide a pathway of success for schools and colleges. This would be acceptable if the accreditors were independent and private but they are not. Accreditors are responsible to the U.S. Department of Education. It would be great to see progress with positive and equitable direction for all accreditors.

Education Department Watchdog Criticizes Oversight of Accreditors

By

The U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General last week released the results of an audit on the department’s recognition processes for accrediting agencies, which serve as the gatekeepers for federal financial aid. The audit found several weaknesses, with concerns that revolved around inadequate supporting documents accreditors present to the department — a process the inspector general said is subject to “cherry-picking” by the agencies.

“We found that the Office of Postsecondary Education’s post-recognition oversight is not adequate to insure agencies consistently and effectively carry out their responsibilities,” the audit report said. “OPE does not have an adequate plan for the post-recognition oversight of agencies and does not regularly perform reviews of high-risk agencies during the recognition period.”

The audit was based on reviews of five accrediting agencies — four institutional and one specialized — which the inspector general did not name in the report. It used data from “dashboards” the department created during the Obama administration in an attempt to better keep track of the performance of accreditors.

When an accrediting agency makes the case for continued recognition to the department, the audit found, it can use compliance information for as few as two colleges.

“OPE takes a reactive approach to post-recognition oversight and performs oversight activities for an agency only if it is alerted that compliance or other issues may exist at that agency,” the inspector general said. “This could result in no oversight for some agencies, including newly recognized or higher risk agencies, for up to five years. In addition, OPE’s oversight approach may not identify significant agency issues soon enough to mitigate or prevent potential harm to accredited schools, students or taxpayers.”

The department under Obama made the rare move to yank recognition for a national accreditor, the Accrediting Council of Independent Colleges and Schools, which oversaw many for-profit colleges, including two large chains that collapsed. However, the Trump administration restored ACICS’s recognition, despite findingnumerous failures by the accreditor to improve, according to an internal staff report the department later released.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: